How SpeedyRooter More Than Doubled Calls +113.6% While Cutting Cost Per Call in Half
4.98 ★ · 180 Google reviews
Google Ads PPC Case Study
ClientSpeedyRooter.com
IndustryPlumbing & Drain
ServiceGoogle Ads PPC
Campaign2022 to 2026
AccountBuilt by RTM
+113.6%Total Calls154 to 329 calls (2024 to 2025)
-51.1%Cost Per Call$153.89 to $75.26
+0.7%Ad BudgetEssentially flat year over year
+17.4%Impressions1.92M to 2.25M
Verified Results
In 2025, SpeedyRooter generated 329 booked phone calls the most in the account’s history while ad spend stayed virtually flat. Same budget, more than double the calls, at half the cost each.
The Client
About SpeedyRooter
CompanySpeedyRooter
WebsiteSpeedyRooter.com
IndustryPlumbing & Drain
Service LineDrain, Sewer, Emergency Plumbing
ChannelGoogle Search Ads (PPC)
GoalInbound Service Calls
SpeedyRooter is a residential and commercial drain, sewer, and emergency plumbing provider that lives and dies by the phone. In their world, a high-intent searcher with a clogged main line or a flooding basement converts in minutes, not weeks. The entire job of their Google Ads program is simple to state and hard to do well: turn ad spend into ringing phones, profitably.
Because plumbing is an emergency-driven category, the buyer journey is short and competition for the click is fierce. Cost per click rises fast when targeting is loose, and a few percentage points of wasted spend compounds into thousands of dollars and dozens of missed calls over a year. That made cost per call the metric that mattered most and the one Real Time Marketing was hired to fix.
The Challenge
A Rising Budget Buying Fewer, More Expensive Calls
Real Time Marketing built and took ownership of the SpeedyRooter Google Ads account in 2022. The early performance trend was the opposite of what any service business wants: spend was climbing while call volume slid and the price of each call kept rising.
Between 2022 and 2024, annual ad budget roughly doubled yet total calls fell from 207 to 189 to 154, and the cost to generate each call climbed every single year, peaking at a punishing $153.89 per call in 2024. The account was spending more to get less.
The Low Point: 2024
154Total calls, down 18.5% year over year
$153.89Cost per call the account’s worst year
$20,622Ad budget spent
The Breakout: 2025
329Total calls (+113.6% year over year)
$75.26Cost per call the account’s best year
$20,774Ad budget spent (+0.7%)
Why cost per call was the real problem
Bigger budgets can buy more clicks. They cannot buy more calls when targeting, structure, and bidding are wrong.
By 2024 the account was a textbook case of spend-without-efficiency: more impressions and dollars, fewer phones ringing. The fix was not a bigger budget. It was a better account.
Our Strategy
Re-Engineering the Account for Calls, Not Clicks
Heading into 2025, Real Time Marketing kept the budget flat on purpose. The goal was to prove the account could do far more with the same money. The plan attacked cost per call from four directions at once.
01
Campaign Rebuild and Intent Segmentation
We collapsed overlapping, budget-leaking campaigns into a tight structure segmented by intent: emergency vs. scheduled, and drain, sewer, and water-heater service lines. Budget stopped spreading thin across everything and concentrated on the searches that actually pick up the phone.
02
High-Intent Keywords and Aggressive Negatives
We prioritized bottom-of-funnel terms (“emergency plumber near me,” “sewer backup,” “clogged drain”) and built layered negative-keyword lists that stripped out broad, curiosity, and DIY queries quietly draining the budget. Fewer wasted impressions, dramatically cheaper qualified clicks.
03
Call-Conversion Bidding and Scheduling
We shifted bidding to optimize for call conversions, leaned into click-to-call on mobile, and weighted ad delivery toward the hours when emergency plumbing searches actually convert. Every dollar was pointed at a phone ringing, not a vanity click.
04
Ad Relevance and Quality Score Lift
We tightened ad-to-landing-page message match and rebuilt ad copy around urgency and trust. Higher Quality Scores meant the same budget bought more impressions at a lower price the mechanical lever behind the 51% drop in cost per call.
The Results
The Same Budget, Twice the Phone Calls
The 2025 turnaround shows up across every metric that matters. Call volume hit a record, cost per call collapsed to an all-time low, and the account finally converted its impressions into ringing phones.
Annual Booked Calls
2022 to 2026 the dip, the bottom, and the breakout. 2026 is January through May only.
Monthly Call Momentum
Month-by-month calls by year 2025 lifts and holds a new baseline throughout
The Cost-Per-Call Collapse
The clearest proof of efficiency is the price of a call. After three years of rising cost peaking at $153.89 in 2024 the rebuilt account cut cost per call to $75.26 in 2025, the lowest in the account’s history and less than half of the prior year.
Cost Per Call
Lower is better. 2024 to 2025 fell 51.1%.
Flat Spend, Compounding Output
The story is not that we spent more. Ad budget rose just +0.7% from 2024 to 2025 effectively flat while calls more than doubled. This chart pairs annual budget against calls to show the efficiency gap snapping open in 2025.
Ad Budget vs. Calls
Budget held steady while call output broke away in 2025
Healthier Impressions
Early years carried bloated, low-quality impression volume that was not converting. After the rebuild trimmed wasted reach, impressions grew +17.4% in 2025 on a flat budget this time made up of the right searches.
Annual Impressions
2022 to 2026 quality over raw volume. 2026 is January through May only.
Compound Annual Growth Rate (2022 to 2025)
Across the full three-year window, the compounding trend is clear: calls and impressions up, the cost of each call trending down.
+16.7%Calls per year207 to 329
+26.9%Ad Budget per year$10.2K to $20.8K
-12.3%Cost Per Call / yr$111.76 to $75.26
-10.0%Impressions / yr3.09M to 2.25M
Reading the CAGRs together
Budget grew faster than calls over the full window because most of that increase happened in the inefficient 2023 to 2024 period. The turnaround year flips the script: in 2025 the account proved it could grow calls and cut cost per call on a flat budget, which is exactly the trajectory the CAGRs are now bending toward.
The Growth Timeline
2022 Account Built
Real Time Marketing launches the account
From an April start, the account books 207 calls at $111.76 per call on a $10,170 budget. Baseline set.
2023 Headwinds
Volume slips as costs creep up
Calls dip to 189 (-8.7%) even as budget climbs to $18,697. Cost per call rises to $137.48 and impressions contract sharply.
2024 The Bottom
The account hits its low point
Volume bottoms at 154 calls (-18.5%) and cost per call peaks at $153.89 the most expensive calls in the account’s history. The full rebuild begins mid-year.
2025 The Breakout
Calls double, cost per call halves
The rebuilt account books a record 329 calls (+113.6%), slashes cost per call to $75.26 (-51.1%), and grows impressions +17.4% all on a budget that rose just +0.7%.
2026 Sustaining
Holding the new baseline
Through May, the account has booked 124 calls at $95.12 per call tracking close to 2025’s record monthly pace and far above the 2024 low.
Year-by-Year Scorecard
Metric
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026 (Jan-May)
Total Calls
207
189
154
329
124
Calls Growth YoY
N/A
-8.7%
-18.5%
+113.6%
N/A
Ad Budget Spent
$10,170
$18,697
$20,622
$20,774
$8,463
Cost Per Call
$111.76
$137.48
$153.89
$75.26
$95.12
Impressions
3.09M
1.77M
1.92M
2.25M
841K
Impressions Growth
N/A
-42.6%
+8.2%
+17.4%
N/A
2026 figures are partial (January through May) and not annualized. Cost per call = ad budget divided by booked calls. CAGR figures are compounded across the full 2022 to 2025 window.
The Takeaway
What SpeedyRooter’s Turnaround Means for Your Business
SpeedyRooter’s results prove a point every service business should internalize: a bigger ad budget is not a growth strategy a better account is. For three years, more spend bought fewer and more expensive calls. The moment the account was rebuilt around high-intent searches, call-conversion bidding, and ruthless waste-cutting, the same budget started producing more than double the phone calls at half the cost each.
If your Google Ads spend keeps rising while your cost per lead climbs with it, the opportunity is not to spend more. It’s to make every dollar you already spend point at a ringing phone. That’s the difference between buying clicks and buying customers.
Your Ad Budget Should Buy Calls, Not Clicks
SpeedyRooter went from 154 calls at $153.89 each to 329 calls at $75.26 on the same budget. If your Google Ads spend keeps climbing while your cost per lead does too, let us find the leaks.
Home/ Case Studies/ Bell Plumbing: Google Ads PPC Google Ads Search PPC Case Study How Bell Plumbing Doubled Monthly Calls and Cut Cost Per Call 37% ClientBell Plumbing MarketSan Carlos and SF Peninsula, CA IndustryPlumbing and Water Heaters Campaign2024 to 2026 ServiceGoogle Ads (Search PPC) +112%Monthly Call Volume48 to 102 calls per month +104%Call Conversions…
Home/ Case Studies/ Clearline Sewer Repair: Google Business Profile Google Business Profile Sewer & Drain clearlinesewerrepair.com From 725 views to 15,571 per year.2,047% growth on Google Business Profile. Clearline Sewer Repair has been building their Google Business Profile presence since late 2022. Over three years, they went from a brand-new listing to generating over 15,500…
Services Case Studies About Blog Free Audit → Home/ Case Studies/ EI Electrical – Google Business Profile GBP Case Study How EI Electrical Grew Google Profile Views by 34% – and What the Data Reveals Next eielectrical.com Electrical Services Campaign: 2023-2026 Service: Google Business Profile +34% GBP Profile Views 32,940 → 44,236 annually +15.9% Visibility…
Connect with us
Follow the work, not just the ads
Algorithm shifts, badge changes, and what they mean for a home-service business, posted
where you already are.